2 October 2009

全球首部伊斯蘭漫畫躍登英國電視螢幕

文字 / 丁燕燕
圖片提供︰Teshkeel Media
原文刊登於「明日風尚」十月號

西方世界的伊斯蘭教恐懼症自911事件後變得有點根深柢固,許多西方民眾無意識地深信伊斯蘭教和可蘭經與暴力密不可分。伊斯蘭那個蠻橫不講理、血腥暴力,一手拿著可蘭經一手拿著彎刀的異教徒形象鮮明地呈現在世人眼前。但,真的是這樣嗎?

「伊斯蘭」這個字的原意是「順從」與「和平」的意思,而所謂的「聖戰」是強調內在精神的自省,與自身邪惡意念鬥爭,淨化心靈。只是許多時在西方主流媒體的報導和詮釋下,事情變得有點扭曲了。相對地,在這樣的宗教、文化形象中長大的孩子們,又如何看待自身?

科威特心理醫生Dr Naif Al-Mutawa基於「為穆斯林孩子創造正面超人偶像」的信念,於2006年開始創作全球首部伊斯蘭超人漫畫「THE 99」。最近,英國Endemol 製作公司更取得該漫畫的電視動畫版權,將為歐洲孩童炮製伊斯蘭式超人故事,重新認識這個神秘的國度。

Al-Mutawa 醫生表示,「在工作中,我聽過不少在薩達姆統治下長大的成年人都曾以薩達姆為偶像,後來受到種種政治迫害,後方才感悟。我相信,我們的孩子們需要正面的偶像,建立價值觀。」於是,這99個英雄便從伊斯蘭傳說中誕生,他們是真主阿拉選派的使者,每人分別擁有一種超能力,例如巨人Jabbar是一個大力士、Noora可以控制光,Darr能夠為人解除痛苦等。但與西方國家的正義超人不同的是,他們來自世界各地,跨越七大洲的99個國家,而且大部份的能力都是「永恆的真理」,如智慧、力量、慈悲、忠誠等。
故事講述的是這99個超能力基因數百年前散落在世界各地,被阿拉選派的人獲得一個基因。知道這個秘密的Dr. Ramzi Razem必須追尋這99個使者的下落,如果能得到他們的合作,他們將為世界帶來和平與繁榮。已尋找多年的Dr. Ramzi Razem任務還未完成,還需努力。

「THE 99」於2006年創刊,旋即成為中東國家、東南亞伊斯蘭國家及印尼的穆斯林大人、小孩的至愛,去年更入選美國富比士的「橫掃全球的20件潮流事」,被一致認為是推崇正面價值觀及娛樂的優良讀物。漫畫由Marvel 及 DC Comics工作室的寫手及漫畫家協力製作,他們亦是漫畫系列如X-Men、蜘蛛俠、超人、蝙蝠俠、Power Rangers等的幕後功臣。

漫畫雖名為「THE 99」,但99個超級英雄並不會同一時間齊集出現,因為根據伊斯蘭教的教義,描繪或刊登真主阿拉肖像是褻瀆的行為。Al-Mutawa 醫生希望,這個全球首創的伊斯蘭教動畫將能促進世界溝通,糾正西方世界對伊斯蘭國家的負面想像,從小孩做起,分享普世認同、跨宗教、跨文化民族的價值觀。

2 September 2009

柏林最大型包浩斯展覽 - Bauhaus. A Conceptual Model

文字 / 丁燕燕
圖片鳴謝︰包浩斯資料館
原文刊登於「明日風尚」九月號

「包浩斯 (Bauhaus )」三個字今天所代表的是一種注重造型及實用機能結合的現代建築風格,它原來指的是1919年於魏瑪成立的包浩斯學院。這所被譽為上世紀歐洲最重要的藝術及設計學校在多事之秋成立,學院亦在政治氣候劇變下兩度搬遷,第一次是1925年遷至德紹 (Dessau),第二次則是納粹黨於德紹大選獲勝後,學院於1932年被迫遷離,並於柏林近郊一舊電話廠繼續辦校。一年後,學院被納粹以「非日耳曼」的政治打擊下被迫解散。包浩斯學院的生存時間只有短短十四來,但回顧歷史,我們不得不承認它是二十世紀德國人對世界文化藝術的最大貢獻。

雖然故事的結局往往不如人願,但九十年後,包浩斯在不一樣的氣候下回歸家鄉。一千多件於1919年至1933年由該校師生創作的設計及藝術作品終於在柏林展出,展覽名為「包浩斯︰一個概念典範 (Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model)」,並於柏林Martin-Gropius-Bau展覽中心展出,為創校以來最大型的包浩斯回顧展。展出選址別具歷史象徵意義,此中心的建築師Martin-Gropius-Bau正是學院創辦人之一Walter Gropius的曾叔父,而地理位置上,毗連建築物一邊是納粹期間秘密警察Gestapo的總部,一邊則是分割柏林二十八年的柏林圍牆舊址。

包浩斯學院成立於魏瑪共和的民主政制,但結束於納粹的暴力統治下。可能正因學院的命運與德國的政治變遷緊緊相扣,所以它今天的回歸柏林便顯得別具英雄氣概。這個回顧展除了紀念創校九十年外,它還為慶祝柏林圍牆倒下二十週年。

但,扣上大帽子對一個展覽來說未必是好事,尤其是背負種種政治、歷史包袱,每每會弄巧成拙。而且關於包浩斯的展覽並非罕見,還有大量的文章、書籍出版等。是次展覽有何獨特、新鮮、過人之處?

幸好,它的確是一個很特別的展覽。首先,它是由三個資料館合辦。學院的資料檔案一直分散在三個地方︰舊共產統治下的魏瑪及德紹,另一部份則存於西柏林,這是首次成功將三個資料館集合在一起。另外,展覽將於今年十一月巡迴至美國紐約現代美術館 (MoMA),故此,它還結合了部份外流至美國的作品。此外,部份最要的包浩斯作品,如Marcel Breuer的鋼鐵傢俱、Herbert Bayer的平面設計、Marianne Brandt以36萬高價被私人收藏的茶壺等,均首次於包浩斯的展覽中展出,蠻有大團圓的感覺。

「大部份的人都清楚知道他們所想像的包浩斯代表的是甚麼,但這只是故事的一部份。」柏林包浩斯資料館負責人Annemarie Jaeggi如是說。「我們嘗試分明它是如何經歷不同的階段,並誕生了不同的風格主張。」當中所謂公眾「不清楚」的故事的另一部份,指的是1926年至1928年學院遷至德紹由Walter Gropius設計的新校舍期間的歷史故事。這時候的教師陣容鼎盛,包括教授繪畫的Josef Albers、Wassily Kandinsky及Paul Klee;教授建築的Walter Gropius;平面設計有Herbert Bayer、傢俱設計有Marcel Breuer、產品設計有Moholy-Nagy等。Gropius建築線條的流麗配上Breuer簡潔發亮的傢俱,使德紹的校舍成為包浩斯風格的具體宣言,公眾立即將此定位為「現代風格」。

但其實這只是包浩斯學院經歷的其中一種風格而已。魏瑪時期,學院內部出現權力鬥爭,不同於校長Gropius的現代主張,另一位創辦人Johannes Itten當時提倡過回歸自我本性、精神至上的創作主張。而學院的宣言由Lyonel Feininger的木刻作插畫,並鼓吹原始藝術的風格。展出的作品顯示Feininger有不少的追隨者,如Breuer在學生年代創作的椅子作品,並以土著藝術作為參考對象。1923年Moholy-Nagy接替Itten,並大力提倡「建構主義」,主張結合藝術與科技,他帶領學院從回現代路線。學院遷至德紹後,由共產主義建築師Hannes Meyer掌舵,學院亦原而出現了實用主義的設計風格,以大眾化的務實態度代替優雅華麗的品味。兩年後,Ludwig Mies van der Rohe上位,他一面與納粹周旋,一面高舉現代建築風格的旗幟,重新塑造學院形象。

學院於1933年關閉後,大批師生流亡海外。Gropius及Breuer在美國哈佛大學栽培了大批現代建築師及設計師,並把他們的包浩斯風格定為珍/真傳,廣泛宣揚。從旁做推手的,還有芝加哥新包浩斯創辦人Moholy-Nagy 及於Illinois 科技學院教授的Mies。留在歐洲的包浩斯人沒有他們幸運,大部份於二戰中身亡,幸存的則於鐵幕政治下與隔絕。是以今天我們所認識的「包浩斯」只是它的其中一面。展覽的重要性及歷史意義,便在於它的全面性及中立性,讓我們看到故事的另一部份。

Bauhaus. A Conceptual Model
2009年7月22日至10月4日
Martin-Gropius-Bau
Niederkirchnerstrasse 7
Berlin D-10963

Captions:

1. Marcel Breuer / Gunta Stölzl“African Chair”, 1921Oak and cherry wood painted with water-soluble paints, hemp, wool, cotton, silk179.4 x 65 x 67.1 cmAcquired with funds provided by the Ernst von Siemens KunststiftungPhoto: Hartwig Klappert, BerlinBauhaus-Archiv Berlin© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009

2. Marcel BreuerClub Chair B 3, 2nd version, 1926Tubular steel, welded transitions and screwed plug and socket connections, anthracite-coloured wire mesh straps70.5 x 81 x 69.5 cm; seat 30 cm high;steel tube diameter 22 mmPhoto: Hartwig Klappert, BerlinStiftung Bauhaus Dessau

23 August 2009

巴黎櫥窗設計

文字及攝影 / 丁燕燕
原文刊登於經濟日報2009年8月18日

有人把商店比喻為書,櫥窗為書的封面。櫥窗設計要先聲奪人、配合時間經濟學、簡潔到位地預示內容,還要引起消費意慾。一個真正的櫥窗設計師,又豈止為塑膠公仔換換衫﹗它是一門綜合了美學、社會學、市場學、心理學以及現代科技的專業知識,促進社會繁榮之餘,還要展現都市魅力。

八月的巴黎人避暑去了,店舖等著九月新系列上架,加上金融危機,此時的櫥窗設計顯得有點尷尷尬尬、不知所措。向來推動當代藝術的Galeries Lafayette今夏索性把櫥窗交給八個藝術單位做另類展出空間,贏了企業形象,又為公眾帶來視覺新刺激。毗連的春天百貨相對有點扭擰,邀請攝影師Bruno Dayan展出相片,郤又要從邊加上陳列品,拖泥帶水。

將空間交給藝術是近年品牌的公關策略,佼佼者為Agnes b.及Colette。先後為多個品牌如Habitat、Bergdorf Goodman、Dunhill擔任創作總監的Stephen di Renza更以身作則。讀電影出身的Stephen去年為某首飾店設計櫥窗時,便打破了珠寶業傳統的堆砌模式,以電影膠卷的意念構思了二百個迴轉陳列盒,讓每件首飾得以獨立展示。「櫥窗比廣告更有力,因為顧客已來到你面前了,這是最直接、最有人味的對話。」Stephen對櫥窗設計的重要性更深信不懷,任職巴黎Dunhill時,他將百分四十的宣傳經費用作櫥窗設計。Place Vendôme店鋪的六面櫥窗成為試驗場,每15天更新設計,互動、觸感營幕、名畫、電影場景等六十多個設計逐一登場,吸引大批人群。他們有進去購買嗎?「溝通比銷售更重要。他們今天不買,明天可能會買。」櫥窗的首要任務是讓顧客認識品牌的歷史和價值,「只有認同它的價值觀,穿上它時才算真正擁有它所標示的身份形象。」安全一直是櫥窗設計的障礙,珠寶店關鋪後一定落鐵閘。但Stephen引用的新式防盜系統、高科技玻璃、高額保險等允許櫥窗二十四小時運作。「在法國,超過五萬歐元的櫥窗是不受保的」,為了展出畢卡索名作,唯有設計日間版和夜間版。

削減廣告開支轉投櫥窗設計的,還有去年十一月在Etienne Marcel大街開業的英國時裝品牌All Saints。「我們刻意打造underground形象,所以不賣廣告。但這個櫥窗設計的確吸引了不少媒體報導﹗」負責人得意地說。這條街素有時裝界木人巷之稱,是設計師自立門戶必經的考驗。要在這裡突圍而出,櫥窗設計就得出奇制勝。All Saints的策略是以ebay拍賣來的350架老爺衣車密舖平面,叫人看得目瞪口呆。這還算是櫥窗設計嗎?「嚴格來說,它是永久性的櫥窗裝置。」潮流百變,櫥窗最就忌的不就是一成不變嗎?「這已不再是定律了﹗櫥窗設計有幾個方向,我們選擇了誇張。」貫穿衣車與時裝的,是vintage這個字。見到衣物想起品牌?未必。但這350架衣車與「All Saints」兩字同樣招積,叫人一見難忘。正如Stephen說,一個成功的櫥窗設計,應該能說出品牌的故事和內涵。

免費廣告還未算櫥窗的最大威力,請聽聽Stephen的兩個故事。七十年代紐約某百貨公司邀請女顧客坐在櫥窗內讓化妝師為她們化妝,化妝時間越長,人群越多,越能满足客人的虛榮心和購買慾,而圍觀的女士們亦雀雀欲試,一嚐當櫥窗模特兒的感覺。另一故事發生在2005年的巴黎,Galeries Lafayette把櫥窗佈置成家居,讓穿著內衣褲的真人模特兒生活在這裡,概念就如行為藝術。兩個真人騷同樣制造了「事件」,憑其前衛大膽富創意成為全城焦點。所以,設計講求創意,創意即「食腦」,與金錢是絕對脫釣。

1. 藝術家Vincent Ganivet於Galeries Lafayette櫥窗展出的作品「Roue」 (2005)。圖片鳴謝︰Vincent Ganivet
2. 先後為多個品牌如Habitat、Bergdorf Goodman、Dunhill擔任創作總監的Stephen di Renza
3. All Saints以350架老爺衣車密舖平面的震撼威力。
4. 在以黑夜為背景的街道上,櫥窗還可以展現另一種舞臺魔術,圖為Fendi專門店。

5. 八月的櫥窗設計一致地黑白、簡約。

13 August 2009

芝加哥藝術學院「摩登新翼」

文字/ 丁燕燕
圖片提供 / The Art Institute of Chicago
原文刊登於「明日風尚」八月號

芝加哥藝術學院(The Art Institute of Chicago)分學院和博物館兩部分,坐落在鬧市Michigan大街的博物館新館「摩登新翼」(The Modern Wing) 為著名建築師Renzo Piano之力作,並於2009年5月16日落成。耗資3億美元,歷時10年的新館背靠博物館大樓而造,三層高的方形建築物面積為26.4萬平方尺(約2.45萬平方米),使芝加哥藝術博物館的總面積達到了100萬平方尺,成為美國繼紐約大都會美術館 (Metropolitan Museum) 後的第二大藝術博物館。

新舊建築之間以1916年建造的一個小型天橋連接。Piano幾乎將博物館做成了一個玻璃盒,最大程度上利用自然光源,除了落地大玻璃窗的普遍運用,頂樓屋頂也是全玻璃的設計,用被建築師本人稱作「懸浮地毯」的白色薄質材料做成的懸浮式百葉簾,既可遮擋住烈日陽光,又在光線的變幻中,為作品帶來不同的體驗。在館內寬敞和大小適宜的展覽廳中,Piano在藝術和參觀者之間營造了一種不受外界干擾但又和外界沒有完全隔離的親近關係,與此同時,上了過濾效果的薄膜的雙層玻璃,在陽光燦爛的日子裏,還會產生出意外的柔和、朦朧、神奇而又怪異的視覺感受,又將街市的喧鬧和極端氣候拒之門外。

新館以收藏和展出1900年之後歐洲和美國藝術家的作品為主,包括繪畫、雕塑、建築設計,另藏有攝影作品和當代多媒體作品。開幕展為混合了塗鴉、書法,具有浪漫象徵主義風格的81歲美國畫家Cy Twombly的作品展。

3 August 2009

initiArt Magazine ONLINE

I am pleased to present to you the launching edition of


initiArt comes from the word “Initiate”
a word designates dynamism and motivation
Take initiations to make things happen
That’s what we should do in life, I believe!

In this launching issue, the 53rd Biennale de Venice is the focus
Special features also cover exclusive interviews with artists

Mario Garcia Torres (Mexico) on history
Paul Chan (New York) on Sade, Freedom, Sexuality and Morality
Chen Qiu-Lin (China) on Memory and Urbanization
Zilvinas Kempinas (Lithuania) on Sensation, Space and Time
Andrei Molodkin (Russia) on the Negative and Positive Force
Tozer Pak (Hong Kong) on a Perfect World
Ming Wong (Singapore) on Language and Identity

Come and discover the unique art magazine free ONLINE

Enjoy reading!


Join us on Facebook :

2 July 2009

Making Worlds - 53rd Biennale di Venezia 2009

Published in InitiArt Magazine

Prelude
The 53rd Venice Biennale which started on 7th June following a four-day VIP preview will last till 22nd November. Taking Making Worlds as the title, this year’s curator, Daniel Birnbaum, said that “a work of art represents a vision of the world and if taken seriously it can be seen as a way of making a world.” As an exhibition, it expresses the curator’s wish to emphasize the process of creation. “Fare Mondi // Making Worlds is an exhibition driven by the aspiration to explore worlds around us as well as worlds ahead. It is about possible new beginnings.” Presented in different languages, the title of the exhibition pointed to issues such as globalization and cultural identity. If the disappearance of one language will take away part of the world’s imagination, then the differences and gaps left over in the process of translation will also increase the world’s imagination. Perhaps that’s how the world was born at the intersections of different cultures. But, what kind of new world does art offer us? How a world imagined by artists differed from the world we encounter everyday? Where lay the possible news beginnings for making an alternative world?


Making lost worlds
The beautiful Venice gives me headache.
With a 5-day agenda fully packed of openings and exhibitions and a map dotted with different colours and shapes, I glided through the matrix of canals and Bernini. Whoever experienced Venice would know that getting lost is part of the program; resorting to body language requests a new kind of theatre training; walking through the evening flood of San Marco is a test of your agility. Desire it or not, everything is guaranteed, not to mention the Sun that’s constantly baking your ice-cream. How to complete the task of visiting 90 artists’ work in the thematic show, 77 national pavilions and 40 collateral events within 120 hours becomes a real challenge. Before I tried to understand how art makes world, I am already lost in the world of art. I followed closely the footsteps of my tour guide.

After sneaking into the cocktail reception of the prestigious Guggenheim Collection where I joined my tour guide, we headed to Arsenale for the thematic show. Like a prelude, Lygia Pape’s (1927 – 2004) poetic installation of gold threads Tteia I, C (2002) announced to us that we are entering into an illusionary world orchestrated by artists’ big ego at our own cost. In the second room, we tried to catch up the performance of the Italian artist Michelangelo Pistoletto (b. 1933). 22 gigantic mirrors arranged alongside the walls, with an eyeshade and a wooden hammer in hand, he broke half of them each in one or two strokes. A big hole with cracks appeared on the surface and thousand pieces of broken glasses on the floor. In what way does such a dramatic act relate to “Making Worlds”? Pistoletto explains, “The stroke is like the Big Bang, the broken glasses are the particles in constant self-multiplication. The reflections of the space from thousands of angles expand the limited space into infinite.”

MICHELANGELO PISTOLETTO, Twentytwo Less Two, 2009, mirror, wood, 22 elements - 300 x 200 cm each, Photo: Alicia Luxem, Courtesy Galleria Continua, San Gimignano / Beijing / Le Moulin

Art provides us different perspectives to see the world; at the same time, it also forces us into naked confrontation with what we do not want to see. Born in Hong Kong in 1973 now lives in New York, Paul Chan’s video Sade for Sade’s Sake (2009) is one of these works. The 5hrs45mins video presents shadow plays of sexual violence and sadism, a critique of the real situation in Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq. So, how did he understand “Making Worlds” as a theme? Paul Chan said, “An individual is a world, a world more than the world itself. A shift of mind means more than a change in gravity itself.” A walk along the long hall took us four hours. I was lucky again to meet another artist Pascale Marthine Tayou (b.1967) from Cameroon. Tayou shows his Mankind (2008), a huge installation featuring an African ghetto with wooden houses whose walls are projecting videos of daily life in modern cities such as Tokyo, Taipei, London, etc. Artist said that he intends to create a world in construction, full of spontaneity, movements and circulation, a communication in the making.


Paul Chan, Sade for Sade's Sake, 2009, Video, loop, 5.45hrs. With Courtesy of the artist.


In Giardini, the newly transformed Palazzo delle Esposizioni stages the other part of the “Making Worlds” show. The first work that caught my eyes, and most of the others, is a huge but airy installation resembles a spider web that fills up a room. The Argentina artist Tomas Saraceno (b. 1973), who also won this year’s Calder Prize, employs lightness and delicateness of the spider web to depict the fragility and vulnerability of the world. A trap waiting for its prey, Saraceno invites audience to walk at the middle of. “I hope they would be tangled up. This is our reality!” Beautiful and tender on the look, dangerous and cruel at the heart. Such equation can justifiably apply to the Swedish artist Nathalie Djurberg’s (b. 1978) morbid work. A garden of over-grown gigantic flowers, colorful but poisonous. Two claymation video installations show deformed men and women searching for love and life. However, the world is too distorted, too morbid, too dark to offer any dream. Tomas Saraceno, Galaxies forming along filaments, like droplets along the strands of a spider's web, 2009, elastic ropes, photo courtesy of the artist

While I was still excited to see the biennale for the first time, my experienced tour guide dropped here and there the same comment, “Done already!” Hard to please? Maybe. Demanding? Surely yes! But isn’t it our rights (finally) to be demanding in Venice? We do expect this prestigious biennale to offer us a new vision, something experimental and innovative as it’s always been. While his disappointment might be with the young and the new, my disappointment is with “the great of the greats”. This year’s Life Achievement Award winner John Baldessari (b. 1931) designed an ocean for the entrance of Palazzo della Esposizioni which is simply too big to be noticed. While the Gold Lion winner Tobias Rehberger (b. 1966) designed a café, Rirkrit Tiravanija (b. 1961) opened a bookshop and the Italian artist Massimo Bartolini (b. 1962) created a permanent education centre. Wait... are their egos tamed by the financial crisis? Why do they all become designers making practical world? Other than blurring the already thin line between contemporary art and architectural design, I cannot see their genius in function. Despite the repeating emphasis on “a possible new start” in the press release, I am afraid that only the truly adult can see the Emperor’s new clothes. Unfortunately, we are in the era of kidult. The conservative taste of the curator failed to give us hints of a possible new vision. The title “Making Worlds” itself is cleverly generous, over-idealistic to be visionary. After visiting the show, one finds it cleverly strategic, over-comprehensive to be responsible. Is there a line of thought in curatorial direction? Does he believe in what he is presenting? Did the curator trap himself with his own strategy of leaping over curatorial traps?

The Gold Lion winner Tobias Rehberger (b. 1966) designed a café

Nevertheless, I am impressed by the Brazilian artist Cildo Meireles (b. 1948)’s colour combination rooms, Chinese artist Chu Yun’s (n. 1977) Constellation consisted of indicative LED lights from domestic appliances and Italian artist Lara Favaretto’s (b. 1973) Swamp, a momentary Pantheon for the “lost” figures of Art’s saints.


National Pavilions and Collateral Events

Among the 77 countries participating in the national pavilions, we see a geographical shift in the art world. With Western Europe obviously suffering from creativity-obesity, the French, the German, the Italian and the Japanese and the Chinese in Asia are out in the qualification match, the ball passed to the traditionally off-centre countries. This year, we have Zilvinas Kempinas’ (b. 1969) VHS tape-constructed Tube in Lithuanian Pavilion to exemplify the beauty of simple interplay between solid and airy, light and shadow, inside and outside. Krzysztof Wodiczko's (b. 1943) projection transforms the internal space of the Polish Pavilion to an illusionary outside, a parallel to the sentiment of his Guests, the immigrants, who are in an eternal state of being the outsiders, the intruders even they are at “home”. In the Egyptian Pavilion, the two artists with 27 years apart crafted the “lightly monumental” to remind us what true art once was. Ahmed El Askalany’s (b. 1979) deity-like monumental figures greet us while we walk into this sacred temple with frescos by Adel El Siwi (b. 1952) of paper, cloth and paint.

Zilvinas Kempinas, "Tube", Wood, nails, magnetic tape, 28 x 3 x 3 meters, site specific installation, 2008.

Krzysztof Wodiczko, Guests, 2009, video installation, 17.17 minutes, courtesy of the artist and Zachęta National Gallery of Art, photo courtesy of Profile Foundation

Andrei Molodkin (b. 1966) is showing alongside 6 compatriots in Russian Pavilion, entitled “The Victory Over the Future”. Molodkin’s installation Red and Black (2009) is as political as usual. Red stands for blood (coming from a Russian solider who has fought at the Iraq war), Black stands for oil. An electrical pump pumps blood and oil into a hollow sculpture of Wings of Thrace, the image of the statue is projected on the wall. What’s the difference between a world imagined by artist and a world imagined by politicians? Molodkin replied that “artists make what’s negative to positive and politician makes positive negative. My statue is hollow, like a film negative, but the projection makes it a firm image. The politicians bring destruction to the world in the name of development.”


Andrei Molodkin, Le rouge et le noir, 2009, Russia Pavillon

Among the Asian pavilions, the real surprise comes from Singapore’s A Life of Imitation in Palazzo Michiel del Brusa. A series of poster paintings in the style of the 1960s, a photo collection of disappeared cinemas, re-interpretation of famous scenes form classical movies, the artist Ming Wong (b. 1971) uses cinema as a collective memory to articulate the fluidity and conflicts of different gender, cultural and identity roles in a multiracial society such as Singapore.


Ming Wong, In the love of mood, 2008. With special thanks to the art. Copyright Ming Wong.

This year’s Best National Pavilion prize goes to the US for its presentation of Bruce Nauman’s Topological Gardens which is shown in three locations: Giardini, Università Iuav di Venezia and Università Ca' Foscari. However, if there is a so call The Most “Mediatique” prize, it would surely go to the Danish and Nordic Pavilions’ The Collectors, curated by Elmgreen & Dragset. Two collectors lived next to each other, a broken family with broken dining tables and dishes, another a homosexual erotic novel writer whose corpse is floating in his swimming pool. Inside the houses are the works created by 22 artists and designers and they are now put on sale. Want to buy them and be a collector yourself?

The collector, curated by Elmgreen & Dragset’s, Danish and Nordic Pavilions

Fortunately, most of the collectors would not end up selling their houses and collections like in Elmgreen & Dragset’s show. One of the events that marked with three stars in my schedule is the opening of French No. 1 collector François Pinault’s new art centre in Punta della Dogana. Entitled Mapping the Studio, the exhibition showcases over 300 works from 60 artists traverse a creative period of four decades. They are all from Pinault’s collection and are open for public. A 2.4 meter tall boy holding a frog by its legs stands at the tip of the island, right outside the building. This marble-white statue of Charles Ray adds one more landmark to Venice. Though it may not be able to give you orientation, the show would surely give new directions to the art market trends.

Charles Ray, Boy with Frog, 2008, marble, 2.5m. Collection Francois Pinault

It takes only 10 mins walk from Dogana to Peggy Guggenheim Collection, the supreme site for contemporary art before Pinault set up his palazzos there. Other than the Gothic towers installed by the Belgian artist Wim Delvoye, there is a good reason to return to Peggy’s ─ to see Robert Rauschenberg’s Glut (1986 – 1989 & 1991 – 1995). As a critique of America’s over-consumption and its resulted modern ruin, Rauschenberg collected hundreds of pieces of metal scrap from junkyards to create a series of poetic assemblages where “the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts”. This unexpected show is later voted by some friends to be the best in this year’s biennale. A truth suddenly revealed to me. When hundreds of biennales are being created all over the world, this single one that born in Venice in 1893 stands out to be the unbeatable Big Daddy not only for its visionary thematic show but also for the fact that a series of high quality collateral events is not possible elsewhere. Sometimes, their quality can even surpass that of the major show.

It is with all the exhibitions, cocktails, openings, parties, etc, that raised a biennale to the status of an unprecedented “contemporary art event”. The four-day-preview has summoned all the VIPs of the art world ─ collectors, museum directors, curators, artists, gallerists, dealers, auctioneers ─ to the little city. The fifth day is the official Opening of the Biennale. However, Madam and Monsieur VIPs already fled the show for the next event in Basel, bringing them champagne and spotlight. This moment, the little city is quiet again and the sunbeam has never been so gleaming. Suddenly, I realized that other than economic return, the Biennale has no much to do with the Venetians.

On this last day, I managed to get a seat to see Steve McQueen’s video Giardini (2009) in the British Pavilion. McQueen showed in two panels the Giradini during off-season when the abandoned space returns to the nature. With static camera lingers on the empty tracks and closed pavilions illuminated by moonlight, we see dogs rambling around, worms and beetles searching for fallen leaves and morning dew. At the middle of a rainy night, at the end of a bare tree branch, a drop of water lingers on. Each shot is a sensitive still photography that restores the dignity and beauty to the nature. At this moment of serenity, we are reminded that art aims to touch upon our soul. When the world agitates for art, art stops to be art.



Steve McQueen, British Pavilion, 2009 Photo: © The British Council, Photography by Prudence Cuming Associates

6 June 2009

烏克蘭PinchukArtCentre 展出Damien Hirst

文字 / 丁燕燕
圖片提供 / PinchukArtCentre © Damien Hirst
原文刊載於「明日風尚」六月號

於四月二十五日開幕、名為「安魂彌撒 (Requiem)」的展覽帶有兩項創舉。第一,它是當今最昂貴的在生藝術家Damien Hirst的最大型個展;第二,它的展出地點PinchukArtCentre是前蘇聯國家內首家私人當代美術館。

Hirst不喜歡在博物館展出,因為「博物館是恭奉已離世的偉大藝術家,它使人感到畏懼」。但43歲的Hirst最後還是選擇了在烏克蘭首都Kiev舉行首次個人美術館展,因為這個前蘇聯國家的人們對當代藝術感到極為新奇、刺激。位於PinchukArtCentre由著名收藏家Victor Pinchuk於去年十月成立,是次展出對於烏克蘭人們來說,可真是千載難逢的機會可以見識Hirst的作品,而且PinchukArtCentre還是不設收費﹗

這次展出集中於1991年至2008年創作的一百多件作品,以雕塑、裝置及繪畫為主。其中四十多件大型骷髏頭顱油畫是Hirst於2006至2008年間創作並首次展出。其他著名作品包括橫剖的鯊魚標本「解釋死亡 Death Explained」(2007)、鯊魚標本「拒絕死亡 Death Denied」(2007)、黑羊標本「離群 Away from the Flock」(1994)、蝴蝶三幅組畫「天堂之道 Doorways to the Kingdom of Heaven」 (2007)等。

Hirst的作品以探討死亡為題材,揭示著死神的無處不在。作品以動物屍體、骷髏、腐爛生物形象為符號,郤以象徵美好、永恆的物料如鑽石、純銀、蝴蝶標本等為創作原料,於對立、矛盾中營造死亡的神秘感、表達人類對死亡的既敬且畏。

Hirst是一位富開創性的藝術家,在1989年一炮而紅的「年輕英國藝術家 YBA」當中,表現最為突出。毋論公眾議論的好壞參半,他商業上的成功,確實為「藝術家」形象下了新注腳。除了創作,懂得經營同樣重要。但Hirst說,藝術的投資功能是某些人想像出來的。「千萬記住,金錢的功能是用來實現你的藝術夢想,而非以為藝術的功能是要來實現你的金錢夢想」。


Damien Hirst -- Requiem
PinchukArtCentre
Block А, 1/3-2, Chervonoarmiyska Street/Baseyna Street
Besarabka quarter, Kyiv, Ukraine

展覽至2009年9月20日結束

2 June 2009

巴黎電車公共藝術計劃

文字及攝影 / 丁燕燕

和很多大城市一樣,進入地底世界之前,巴黎市公共交通以小型蒸汽火車為主導。這種電車前身的交通系統於1855年開始運作,五十年後逐漸被地下鐵路metro取代,最後一條路線亦於1957年關閉。又五十的光景,巴黎市政府再次推行環保電車,1992年開啟第一條現代化電車路線,連繫邊緣區域。於2006年尾啟用的三號路線,被歸納進都市規劃的一部份,並將電車沿線空間作為公共藝術用途。投入四百萬歐羅的公共藝術計劃於去年底落成,至今已有八件作品於巴黎市中心展示。

其中以位於十五區Pont du Garigliano的作品最為矚目。由著名建築師Franck O. Gehry及概念藝術家Sophie Calle合作的創作的Fleur (花)雕塑為五米高、四米寬、三米深,巨型裝置安放在橫跨塞納河的行人天橋上,由紅、橙、黃組成的六片金屬花瓣在陽光中綽約生姿。柔媚的線條、重疊的花瓣叫人聯想到Bilbao的Guggenheim美術館。花卉雕塑內藏有一個電話,以「溝通」為創作主旨的概念藝術家Sophie Calle每星期會數次電花卉,讓路過的陌生人接聽電話,開始一個又一個的「偶發溝通」故事。

另一個大型裝置為Dan Graham向十八世紀著名建築師Louis-Etienne Boullée致敬的作品 « From Boullée to Eternity »,藝術家於十五區Porte de Versailles展覽中心門前建立建築雕塑等候室,全玻璃的大型空間打破了公共/私人、透視/隱閉、看/被看、內/外的對立。

其他的參與藝術家包括Christian Boltanski、Angela Bulloch、Didier Fiuza Faustino、Peter Kogler、Bertrand Lavier及Claude Lévêque。

1 June 2009

威尼斯雙年展

文字 / 丁燕燕
圖片提供 / 第五十三屆威尼斯雙年

第五十三屆威尼斯雙年展將於六月七日正式開幕。於一八九五年創辦的威尼斯雙年被譽為世界上最具影響力與規模最大的國際美術展覽,往往以其重要性與前瞻性成為藝術趨勢的指標。

威尼斯雙年展分為主題館與國家館兩部分。主題館由大會委任一位或兩位國際策展人籌劃,藝術家不分國籍、不分媒介,共同展示作品。今屆策展人Daniel Birnbaum以「制造世界(Making Worlds)」為題,強調藝術創作過程的重要性。Birnbaum稱,「一件作品代表著一種世界觀,更嚴肅地說,它是制造世界的一種方法」。雙年展將自己定位於美術館機制及藝術市場之外,往往於一大主題下廣泛地含蓋多個輩份、地域界別的藝術家,以大膽及實驗性的角度開拓新空間及可能性。固此,Birnbaum藉此展出作為探索現實世界的方法,同時亦與公眾共同窺視未來。主題展於Giardini及Arsenale的Palazzo delle Esposizioni主場館展出,獲邀請的藝術家逾九十位,其中包括華人藝術家黃永砅、儲雲、王田田、徐坦。

國家館方面,今年共有創紀錄的七十七個國家參加,第一次出現的國家包括摩納哥、黑山(Montenegro)、加蓬共和國(Gabonese Republic)、科摩羅聯盟(The Comoros)及阿拉伯聯合酋長國。

此外,亦有不少地區未能正式以國家館身份參加而以地域名義作為外圍展,如「台灣館」今屆將展出李善單作品,並由知名的Achille Bonito Oliva擔任主策展人。「香港館」則由年輕概念藝術家白雙全以個人主題館參展,題為「製造(完美的)世界:海洋、香港、異邦的城市和夢」,透過創作傳達個人對城市中矛盾、膚淺、或無意義的事物領會。

今屆雙年展的終身成就金獅獎將頒發給日本藝術家大野洋子(Yoko Ono)及美國藝術家 John Baldessari.

第五十三屆威尼斯雙年展
展期︰六月七日至十一月二十二日(逢星期二休館)
主場館︰Palazzo delle Esposizioni, Giardini & Arsenale, Venice

23 May 2009

La Sociéte – 巴黎

文字 / 丁燕燕
相片提供 / La Sociéte
原文到載於「明日風尚」2009年五月號

來到聖日曼德佩廣場6號郤找不到目的地,唯有請教於同是6號的著名咖啡廳Les Deux Magots。服務員指著旁邊的一座六層高大樓說,Costes氏家族的餐廳就在那裡。沒有耀眼的招牌,就連玻璃大門也在幽暗的燈光下變得不起眼。推開玻璃門,眼前是兩扇三米高的沉重大木門,緊緊掩閉在內的正是新開張的餐廳La Sociéte。如此不張不揚地開張,它依然成為傳媒的時尚焦點,這叫深藏不露的高貴,這裡所代表的「社會」絕非普羅大眾,而是深宅大院裡的high society。共設130位的餐廳極速成為了名人食堂,客人包括Fendi家族、Domenico Dolce、Stefano Gabbana、哲學家Bernard-Henri Lévy及司法部長Rachida Dati。

餐廳室內裝潢由著名設計師Christian Liaigre操刀,這位曾為倫敦Selfridges及紐約Mercer酒店作設計的天才,是次選擇以巧克力色搭白色為主調,再以橘子色燈光提昇室內暖和度,並把大量空間交由藝術家創作。Jacques Martinez的銅柱雕塑、Sophie Lafont的大理石香檳吧、Gérard Traquandi掛在牆上的抽象陶瓷雕塑、Stéphanie Balini的簡約吊燈、Peter Lindbergh的攝影作品等等。而Christian Liaigre設計的皮革椅子、玻璃面的餐桌、花卉擺設等則營造懶洋洋的酒廊氣氛。

餐單方面,除了少不得的招牌法國菜鵝肝、龍虾、蝸牛之類,還有fusion的另類選擇如冬陰辣鱈魚、Le Club Saint-Germain三明治、脆皮燒鴨等。如果你不要點錯了那每道三百歐羅的魚子醬的話,一頓三道菜的午餐或晚餐加一杯酒約是六十歐羅。

La Sociéte, Paris
4 Place Saint-Germain-des-Près, 75006 Paris
+33.1 5363 6060